, , . , , , « » . . , 60-65 % , . , , . , . . , , [1-3]. , , . ) ( ) , . . ( 3 , ) ). . . . , , ) . . , , . , . , , , . , . , , , , , . ( ) 4 . , . , , , , . » . . , , . [4-6] . [7-9]. , , , , , . , . , , : 5 1) ) ; 2) ; 3) ; 4) ; 5) ( ) , , ; 6) , ; 7) ; 8) , – ; 9) , . . , . – [10], ( , , , ). , , . , , , . 6 . , , – . , , , : , ( ) ; ( ) . , . 15 3 25,4 , . , [11]. 229 . , , , . , 7 12 , , 3 14,5 , , . [12-16]. , , , ). , . , . , ( ) , . , . , , . ( ). . 20-23 3 – 9,0-14,5 . 8 , 3 , . , . – , . . [11]. , , . , , – . , , : 1) , 2) 3 8-12 , – 8-12 ; , , 3 , , . , , , . 20 9 . , . . . , : 1) , , . , , , , ; 2) , . , , , . , , , , , , , . , 10 , , . , , . , . , ( ). , , . « », , , , . , , 11 . , . . , , . , , . ( ) , , . , , . , 2300-2350 3 , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , . 12 , 1.Bennion D.B., Thomac F.B., Bietz R.F and Bennion D.W. Underbalanced Drilling, Praises and Perila, SPEDC (December 1998), pp.214-222, SPE 52889/ 2.Stone R. The History and Deverlopment of Underbalanced Drilling in the USA, paper presented at the 1995 International Underbalanced Drilling Conference & Exhibition, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2-4 October/ 3.Santos H. and Queiraz I. Hove Effective is Underbalanced Drilling in Preventing Formation Damage, Paper SPE 58738, 2000 International Conference on Formation Damage, Lafayette, 23-24 February 2000. 4. ., . . // , 2011, 5. ., 2. .22-25. ., . // .19-22. 6. ., // , 2011, . , 2012, 7. 4. 1. .11-13. . // . : «Printmash», 2004. . 104-109. 8.Ivan C., Quintana I. and Blake L. Aphron – Base Drilling Fluid: Evolving Technologies for Lost Circulation Control, Paper SPE 71377, presented at the 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in New Orleans, Louisiana, 30 September – 30 October 2001. 9.Ivan C., Growcock F. and Friedheim I. Chemical and Physical Characterization of Aphron – Bazed Drilling Fluids, Paper SPE 77445, presented 13 at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in San Antonio, Texas, 29 September – 2 October 2002. 10.Reid P., Labenski F. and Santos H. Drilling Fluids approaches for Control of Wellbore Instability in Fractured Formations, Paper SPE/IADC 85304, presented at the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition held in Abu Dhabi, UAE, 20-22 October 2003 11.Semmelbeck M.E. and Dewan I.T. Invasion-Based Method For Estimating Permeability From loga, Paper SPE 30581, presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Dallas, TX, USA, 22-25 October 1995. 12.Bennion D.B., Thomas F.B. and Bennion D.W. Effective laboratory coreflood tests to evaluate and minimize formation damage in horizontal wells: Third International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, November 1214, 1991, Houston, Texas. 13.Abrams A. Mud design to minimize rock impairment due to particle invasion: Journal of Petroleum Technology, may 1977, 586-592. 14.Glenn E.E. and Slusser M.L. Factors affecting well productivety II – drilling fluid particle invasion into porous media: Trans Soc. Pet. Eng. 1954, Vol 210, 126-131. 15.Krueger R.F, an overview of formation damage and well productivity in oilfield operations: Journal of Petroleum Technology, February 1986, 131-152. 16.Potter K.E. an overview of formation damage: Journal of Petroleum Technology, Ang. 1989, 780-786/ 17.Santos H. Differentially Stuck Pipe: Early Diagnostic and solution, Paper SPE 59127, presented at the 2000 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference held New Orleans, Louisiana, 22-25 February 2000. 14