Modern Language Studies Review Reviewed Work(s): Literature After Postmodernism: Reconstructive Fantasies by Irmtraud Huber Review by: Emily Hall Source: Modern Language Studies, Vol. 50, No. 1 (SUMMER 2020), pp. 96-100 Published by: Modern Language Studies Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/45388471 Accessed: 09-08-2024 08:32 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Modern Language Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Modern Language Studies This content downloaded from 109.252.47.197 on Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:32:03 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Literature After Postmodernism: Reconstructive Fantasies Irmtraud Huber New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 291pp. $90/paperback Emily Hall, University of North Carolina at Greensboro In recent years, numerous critics from Peter Boxali engage with are still wholly postmodern. Herein lies to Wolfgang Funk have argued that postmodernism Huber s most provocative and convincing argument: is dead, although the reasons behind its death are social realism has not "replaced" postmodernism; constantly contested and ever-shifting. For some instead, literature after postmodernism can be defined scholars, postmodernisms death was spurred by by its efforts to reconstruct notions of authenticity, global and cultural changes such as the September history, and meaning after their deconstruction. 11th terror attack. For others, the shift toward a The monograph is divided into two sections. global culture, along with the technological and The first, called "Tracing Shifts," contains two digital changes that reshaped our perception of time chapters, "Post-post, Beyond and Back: Literature and communication, created a fissure between the in the Wake of Postmodernism" and "Pragmatic twentieth and twenty-first centuries and signaled new Fantasies: From Subversion to Reconstruction." These literary and cultural changes. For Irmtraud Huber, chapters foreground the scholarly conversations postmodernisms demise can be distilled into two about postmodernisms end and illuminate how interconnected issues: the institutionalization of its various concepts such as authenticity, sincerity, and tenets and values, especially in the classroom, and its reconstruction have "replaced" postmodernism. The absorption into mass culture. According to Huber, second section of the monograph, "Reconstructive postmodernism has lost the "oppositional stance" Readings," contains four chapters that each explore and subversion that first defined it (4). a novel: Mark Z. Danielewski s House of Leaves, Notably, Huber does not argue that the exper- Jonathan Safran Foer s Everything is Illuminated , imentation and playfulness of postmodernism is over. In fact, while scholars such as Paul Dawson Michael Chabons The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier have argued that authors are turning away from methodology for drawing these writers together is & Clay , and David Mitchells number9dream. Her experimentalism and returning to realism, Huber twofold. First, she creates a kind of teleology from presents a more complicated view of how writers a writer beginning to recognize the value of recon- are still engaging with postmodernism. While she structing narratives (Danielewski) to a writer fully acknowledges that novelists like Jonathan Franzen invested in illuminating narratives ability to offer have suggested that postmodernism has outlived escapism and healing (Mitchell). Second, Huber its purpose by becoming so institutionalized, she is locates the interest in reconstruction in works that quick to note that even when writers have turned combine the fantastic with mimesis. Indeed, she back to social realism, the core ideas in their novels explores novels that have a mimetic outer-frame are still often based on postmodern ideologies. Thus, story and a magical realist or supernatural inner writers like Franzen may be using realist tenets like frame. In doing so, she explores how these fantastic omniscient narration, but the ideas their novels novels are metafictional, as "they foreground the 96 Modern Language Studies 50.1 This content downloaded from 109.252.47.197 on Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:32:03 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms interplay of the real and the imaginary in the fictive" that "[i]f all narrative acts are contingent, [then] while challenging our notions of reality "to explore the choice of mimetic realism at the end of the day the creative potential of fictions" (14). The novels, is just as valid as any anti-illusionist metafictional according to Huber, signal a new interest in the disruption: its just a different kind of game to play" ways we use narrative to connect and communicate, (26). Significantly, Huber uses Robert McLaughlins and they reaffirm representation and reality while scholarship to illuminate how Neo-Realist novels resisting totalizing experiences. posit that narratives may be contingent, but that In "Post-post, Beyond and Back: Literature in we still understand one another and make authen- the Wake of Postmodernism," Huber observes how tic connections through language. Thus, Huber s authors such as American novelist Paul Auster are literature review elucidates the many views on searching "elsewhere," beyond postmodernism, Neorealism while emphasizing the importance for their subject matter (22). She then explores the that language, sincerity, and authenticity play in inherent paradox: if postmodernism suggested that post-postmodern fiction. we were already witnessing the "ends" of things The second half of the chapter focuses on (such as the representation of experience, the ability another movement, much less defined, and Huber to construct objective histories, and the stability acknowledges that this blurriness arises from the of language and communication), then how can lack of coherence amongst the writers who are writers envision a future beyond the so-called end invested in what is roughly defined as New Sincerity. of narrative? She posits that, in the wake of decon- This movement (which is, according to some of the struction, writers are now "recover [ing] a sense scholars Huber cites, barely a movement) champions of commitment and sincerity" (Huber 24). At the the ability for writers to sincerely connect with their same time, she acknowledges that efforts to move audiences. Sincerity also plays an important role in past postmodernist ideologies are wildly diverse and the novels' subject matter, as these works value the involve everything from publishing "fiction that is bonds between authors and their readers and the no longer centrally concerned with unmasking" to bonds between the characters in the novel. This creating optimistic if not outwardly naive texts (24). emphasis on sincerity and optimism, particularly The first half of the chapter explores some of the optimistic belief that people can communicate the many ideologies and movements after postmod- sincerely with one another, is what separates New ernism, one of which is Neorealism. Huber provides Sincerity from postmodernism, with its skepticism a useful literature review that covers an array of about the idea that we could communicate meaning contested critical conversations about Neorealism. and truth to one another. Huber expands this idea by She explores how some scholars such as Alan Kirby exploring how sincerity shapes ideas about belief in posit that Neorealism has no "aesthetic profile," as contemporary literature. She examines the role belief Neo -Realist authors only work in opposition to plays in reconstructive literature by exemplifying postmodern texts (25). Huber complicates these how readers are invited to sincerely "believe" the claims with Robert Reinfield s work on Neorealism events that occur in the novel? Part of this argument in which he explores how Neo-Realist texts are not hinges on the idea that authors "surrender" to readers working in opposition to postmodernism, but instead through "authorial humility and self-depreciation" have internalized aspects of postmodernisms views (38). Huber probably understands authorial humility on representation and acknowledge the limitations as the author humbly asking the reader to accept of mimesis. At the same time, Neo-Realists insist the optimistic desire to believe sincerely. That said, reviews 97 This content downloaded from 109.252.47.197 on Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:32:03 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms this idea is repeated a few times in this chapter and, fantastic for their agenda" (53). Even so, she suggests even though Huber refers to Wolfgang Funk, who that the subversive powers of fantasy have been wrote about this subject extensively in The Literature dulled as they have become somewhat mainstream. of Reconstruction, Huber never quite illuminates In the face of fantasy's waning abilities to subvert, how and when authors humble themselves to their she posits that critics need a new way of approaching readers, an oversight that obscures the ideas she fantasy. If studies on fantastic literature typically hopes to clarify. Nevertheless, Huber effectively raise epistemological questions about the reliability situates her own argument about the future of of the "depicted world" and ontological concerns literary post-postmodernism amongst all these about "what kind of world" is presented, then Huber various movements, and she argues that this future suggests that a third, pragmatic approach should is shaped by notions of reconstruction. If meaning, emerge that prompts us to question how the reader history, and communication were all deconstructed is supposed to react to these kinds of questions (59). by postmodernists, then post-postmodernists want to She argues that reconstructive works interrogate this reconstruct these notions, and they sincerely believe third, pragmatic mode, as they explore how the reader that they can communicate meaning to readers. She confronts epistemological and ontological shifts. claims that focusing on reconstruction allows her to While such a concept could become unwieldy in the hands of another scholar, Huber uses Yann circumvent siding with a particular "movement," and instead allows her to examine authorial desires that Martels The Life of Pi as an example of a reconstruc- span many interests and movements. Her decision tive text that illuminates the importance of readers to read across literature rather than illuminate a navigating particular choices by contrasting mimesis specific moment is thoughtful and well-defended, with fantasy. At the end of The Life of Pi, readers are especially since the field of twenty-first century left with two possible readings: either Pi did travel studies is something of a palimpsest of competing across the ocean on a ship filled with predatory visions of the present. By avoiding aligning herself animals or he traveled with the human survivors of with a specific movement, Huber guarantees that a shipwreck. Huber argues that this choice, which is the work will not be quickly outdated. left for readers to decide, does not present either pos- Huber develops her notion of reconstruction sibility as accurate. Instead, it presents two possible in the second chapter, "Pragmatic Fantasies: From readings (a mimetic or a fantastic one) to emphasize Subversion to Reconstruction." She specifically examines novels that contrast mimesis and its the "responsibility of choice" by pressuring the reader to decide between the two alternative readings (65). emphasis on accuracy against fantasy and its embrace Significantly, Huber maintains that in a postmodern of the impossible, and she explores how various work, readers' choices are framed as meaningless contemporary novelists contrast the mimetic and the fantastic in order to interrogate storytelling because texts continuously defer meaning, while a reconstructive text invites readers to assess the and readerly responsibilities. Here, she argues implications of telling and reading stories. In doing that the return to mimesis is a reaction against the so, the reconstructive "novels self- critically' question subversion of fantasy, a category that refers to a the uses and effects of the fictive, its consolatory broad range of texts from popular fantasy to magical power, its affinity to escapism, its ability to provoke realism. Huber argues that critics who "favour and thought and action, to misguide and to reveal" (65). emphasise subversion and counter-discourse [...] Reconstructive works thus highlight the fictiveness have frequently acknowledged the potential of the of the story, not to emphasize its constructiveness 98 Modern Language Studies 50.1 This content downloaded from 109.252.47.197 on Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:32:03 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms like a postmodern text but to remind us of the of magical realism and imagined scenarios - with power of story and readerly responsibilities. This is its mimetic deception of the protagonist traveling a provocative argument and undoubtedly will have to Ukraine. She notes that this mimetic frame great influence for scholars studying literature after describes real-life trauma and, in doing so, refutes postmodernism, as it usefully contrasts the problems postmodern skepticism, as the novel asserts that "the with postmodernisms legacy and its emphasis on primary focus is not the possibility or impossibility doubt and ambivalence towards a post-postmodern of their [traumatic experiences] representation and present that emphasizes notions of sincerity and comprehension" (117). Significantly, Huber never responsibility. refutes the notion that the novel "plays" with the In the chapters that follow "Pragmatic Fantasies," past; however, she clarifies that "the past is indeed Huber locates reconstructive agendas in each of the opened to creative interpretation, but only as long four novels she examines. The chapters can easily be the latter remains within the self-declared bounds read independent of one another, which could be of fiction" (117). In other words, reconstructive useful for a graduate class if the instructor wanted to literature still pulls from postmodern historical assign a reading on any number of the reconstructive playfulness but it contextualizes, and delimits, the topics and authors Huber examines. The first close boundaries of this playfulness. This controversially reading is "Leaving the Postmodernist Labyrinth: suggests that reconstructive literature can "look" like Mark Z. Danielewski s House of Leaves ." While historiographie metafiction, so we must consider Danielewskis novel has long been considered an whether this metafiction is framed by mimetic exemplary postmodern work, Huber s analysis of fiction to understand how the author presents the its reconstructive agenda provides a fresh reading. historical message. She argues the fantastic elements in the story (a The third chapter, "Escaping Towards History: labyrinthine, empty house) evoke postmodernisms Michael Chabons The Amazing Adventures of nihilism and the absence of meaning. In contrast to Kavalier & Clay? explores how Chabons novel this nihilism, Huber suggests, is the constant reaffir- demonstrates a keen interest in mimesis over the mation of the power of story and communication. ruptures of postmodernism. She observes that the Characters repeatedly strive to tell their histories fantastic sections within The Amazing Adventures and, in turn, the reader connects the many disparate of Kavalier & Clay never "expose and evoke what voices and experiences, filling the postmodern void lies beneath" reality and instead serve as "escape [s] with a return to "stories and connections" (102). from" the trauma of the past (151). Hence, literature Huber builds upon this notion of reconstructing can be used as an escape from reality. At the same communication after postmodernism and post- time, Huber notes that the historical fiction novel structuralism in the next chapter, "The Quest for does, in its more mimetic frame, occasionally employ Narrative Reconstruction: Jonathan Safran Foer s elements of historiographie metafiction (particularly Everything is Illuminated ." This chapter reclassifies by using transworld characters), but it never calls Foer s text as a reconstructive work by refuting the attention to these metafictional -practices, suggesting notion that the novel is a work of historiographie that the novel rejects postmodern concerns about metafiction and instead positing that the texts the textuality of the past. She posits that the novels "main focus lies on the processes, forms and effects unabashed use of postmodern techniques while of writing (and reading) in the present" (115). She refusing to yield to postmodern skepticism signals contrasts the novels "fantastic" elements - its use a shift from "truth" to "trust" (159). If postmodern reviews 99 This content downloaded from 109.252.47.197 on Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:32:03 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms writers questioned our ability to write about historical by arguing that female contemporary novelists rarely truths, then post-postmodern writers aim to convince blend mimesis with fantasy, although she does note readers to trust that they are writing as faithfully that Margaret Atwood, Nicole Krauss, and A. S. about the past as possible. Part of what Chabons Byatt have written works that come close to conveying novel does, according to Huber, is reconstruct this a reconstructive agenda. One cannot help but be a pact of trust with readers by suggesting that, while bit disappointed by Huber s justification: if women authors do need to rely on texts to describe the and writers of color rarely mix fantasy and mimesis past, fiction can in some way work to capture the in the same manner as white male writers, then experiences of the Real. perhaps Huber s own definition is overly restrictive. Huber returns to notions of fictional escapism While she understandably needed to limit her own in the last chapter, "Dreaming of Reconstruction: exploration of reconstruction to a few exemplary David Mitchells number9dream ." She observes how writers, and no critic can account for every writer s Mitchell combines a variety of genres to "establish approach to a literary trend, limiting the monograph different kinds of fictional communication" (183). to male writers and admitting that many female The fantastic elements in Mitchells novel highlight writers do not fit into her conceptualization of fantasy the protagonists repeated lapses into daydreams. and mimesis may make it difficult for other scholars These daydreams often break into the mimetic to apply the ideas she raises to their own work. At sections of the novel. However, Huber argues that the same time, the monograph poses a challenge to these breaks are not meant to demonstrate the scholars to locate reconstructive efforts in fiction instability of reality but to prompt the reader to by women writers and writers of color as their works think about how reality is suffused "with dreams, undoubtedly also emphasize notions of readerly addressing not only the dangers of this fusion but responsibility and reaffirm the ability for literature also the potential of dreams to transform and to to tell our stories. create" (187). She suggests that the novel partly resolves these tensions by emphasizing that the protagonist is always aware that his daydreams are just fictional constructions. Thus, his sense of reality is never truly disturbed by the onslaught of dreams. Furthermore, she finds the novels use of diverse genres a testament to the creative possibilities of fiction, which is, again, a departure from the kinds of exhaustion that postmodern works espouse. Through these close readings, Huber provides fresh readings of works that have long been consid- ered hallmarks of postmodernism. This thesis, in conjunction with her ideas on how literature is moving away from postmodernism towards reconstruction, proves an exciting and significant contribution to post-postmodern studies. However, in her conclusion, Huber acknowledges that she focuses exclusively on male writers and justifies this decision 1 00 Modern Language Studies 50. 1 This content downloaded from 109.252.47.197 on Fri, 09 Aug 2024 08:32:03 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms