Борискин О.И. 73 Морских Протеста на английском 2017 SPECIMEN LETTER OF INSTRUCTION TO AGENTS M/T “ A R B A T “ AT MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA DATE: OCTOBER 01, 2001 TO: ADSTEAM AGENCY PTE LTD LEVEL 1, ALBERT ROAD SOUTH MELBOURNE VIC 3205 AUSTRALIA PO BOX 345 TLF 613 9682 0234 TLX 51 94078979 FAX 613 9682 0229 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, I hereby confirm that you have authority to sign bills of lading on my behalf in respect of the following cargo loaded at this port and said to be: MAIN COLUMN BOTTOMS 19670.28 tonnes 134 151 BBLS at 60 F Density at 15 0.9237 Please note that you do not have authority to sign any bill of lading which does not specifically incorporate the terms, conditions and exeptions of the Charter Party ARBAT/BHP dated 31/07/2001 and/or the Hague Rules ( or legislation of similar effect ). The destination shown in the bills of lading should be consistent with the provisions of the Charter Party governing this voyage/Charter’s instructions, which stipulate that the vessel will discharge at Singapore. Please ensure that all bills are properly dated September 29, 2001. On no account should “freight prepaid” bills be issued without the express authority of my Company/Owners, to whom you should refer on this and any other matter concerning the signing and issuing of bills of lading. Yours faithfully Capt. Aleksandr Ivanov MASTER TO: PETROPLUS MILFORD HAVEN TO: CONSIGNEE MARC RICH AND CO INVESTMENT AG M.T. ARBAT PORT: MILFORD HAVEN, UK Berth No 1 GLEFI SHIPPING V CO DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2000 VOYAGE NO 2005 RE: DELAY DUE TO AWAITING FOR BERTH LETTER OF PROTEST DEAR SIRS, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT MY VESSEL HAS ARRIVED AT PORT ON 15TH APRIL, 2000 AT 16.00 LT AND FROM THAT TIME TILL 17TH APRIL, 2000 04.00 LT WAS WAITING FOR BERTH AT ANCHORAGE. ON BEHALF OF MY OWNERS/CHARTERERS AND ANY OR ALL OTHER THIRD PARTIES THAT ARE OR MAY BE CONCERNED I FORMALY PROTEST AND HOLD YOU AND YOUR PRINCIPALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSEQUENCES CAUSED DUE TO THESE DELAY. I FURTHER RESERVE THE RIGHTS OF MY OWNERS/CHARTERERS TO REFER TO THIS MATTER AT A LATER DATE, TIME OR PLACE. FOR DETAILS PLEASE SEE TIMESHEET, NOR. YOURS TRULY, CAPT. A. IVANOV MASTER RECEIVED: ……………………………………………………….. To: MITSUI OIL (ASIA) To: MITSUI TOKYO To: NEW PIRPAU JETTY, MUMBAI To: TATA POWER Co, MUMBAI To: Whom it may concern M.T. A R B A T Glefi Shipping Vco. Voyage No 0111 Port : Mumbai, India Cargo : Low Sulphur Waxy Residue 214 714.162 bbls Date : November 04, 2001 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the discharging operations at New PirPau Jetty, the vessel notes protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. Re: DELAYS From 02.11.01 17.55 Lt till 02.11.01 18.15 Lt – Loading Furnace oil plug suspended as per terminal request From 02.11.01 21.55 Lt till 02.11.01 22.15 Lt – Discharging suspended as per terminal request On behalf of my Owners/ Charters and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I formally protested and hold your principals responsible for the above said delays, consequences, if any, caused due to awaiting for shore readiness, suspended loading and discharging. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/ Charters to refer to this matter at a later date, time and place. For details please see statement of fact dated November 04, 2001. Yours Faithfully, Captain A. Ivanov MASTER Accepted/ Received: ……………………………………. New PirPau Jetty Representative To: BHP Transport To: Whom it may concern M.T. A R B A T Glefi Shipping Vco. Voyage No 0109 Port : Kembla, Australia Cargo : Fuel and Diesel Oil Date : September 13, 2001 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the discharging operations at port Kembla, Oil Berth, the vessel notes protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. HIGH BACK PRESSURE Actual discharging time consisted ______ hrs ______ min’s instead of ship’s discharge capability at 05 hrs 40 min’s. Delay ________hrs _______min’s due to high back pressure. Within all time of discharging vessel maintained discharge pressure at ship’s manifolds 100 pci. The discharging facilities were insufficient to utilize my vessel’s full discharging capacity. AWAITING FOR SHORE READINESS The vessel ceased discharged on the 12 th September, 2001 from 0820 hrs Lt to 0900 hrs Lt as per terminal reasons. On behalf of my Owners and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I formally protested and hold your principals responsible for the delays, consequences, if any, caused due to high back pressure and awaiting for shore readiness. I further reserve the rights of my Owners to refer to this matter at a later date, time and place. For details please see Pumping Log and Statement of Fact dated September 13, 2001. Yours Faithfully, Captain A. Ivanov MASTER Accepted/ Received: BHP Transport and terminal Representative TO: MIECO INC. CC: BP-AMOCO M.T. A R B A T GLEFI SHIPPING V CO TO:WHOM IT MAY CONCERN PORT: LONG BEACH, USA DATE: DECEMBER 16, 2000 VOYAGE NR 2006 LETTER OF PROTEST RE: DELAY DUE TO AWAITING FOR BERTH DEAR SIRS, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT MY VESSEL HAS ARRIVED AT PORT, ANCHORED AT INNER ROAD ON DECEMBER 13, 2000 AT 0240 LT. FROM DECEMBER 13, 2000 0240 LT TO 1340 LT THE VESSEL WAS AWAITING FOR BERTH AT ANCHOR. ON BEHALF OF MY OWNERS/CHARTERERS AND ANY OR ALL OTHER THIRD PARTIES THAT ARE OR MAY BE CONCERNED I FORMALY PROTEST AND HOLD YOU AND YOUR PRINCIPALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSEQUENCES CAUSED DUE TO THESE DELAY. I FURTHER RESERVE THE RIGHTS OF MY OWNERS/CHARTERERS TO REFER TO THIS MATTER AT A LATER DATE, TIME OR PLACE. YOURS TRULY, RECEIVED: CAPT. A. IVANOV ……………………………………………………….. MASTER SHIPPER REPRESENTATIVE To: ExxonMobil Oil Australia To: BHP Billiton, Melbourne To: Raffles, Singapore m.t. ARBAT Glefi Shipping V Co Voyage 0110 Cc: To Whom It May Concern Port : Melbourne, Australia Berth: Gellibrand pier Date : September 29th, 2001 DEADFREIGHT STATEMENT Dear Sirs, As per Charter’s voyage orders my vessel is scheduled to load a cargo of Main Column Bottoms from min16000 to max 20000 mt at Gellibrand pier. As a consequence of above said orders I must submit the below calculation setting forth the total cargo capacity available and additional quantity which could have been loaded had my vessel been supplied up to max Summer Deadweight. Summer Deadweight on sailing Summer Deadweight on draft Less: Fuel Oil Bunkers DO Bunkers 7.40 m SW draft 12.205 m SW 23 200, 00 mt. 47 083, 75 mt 661, 00 32, 87 mt mt Slops (Certificate enclosed) Fresh Water Constant (stores, lubes, ballast etc.) Nil 120, 00 mt 620, 00 Tonnage available for cargo Less cargo actually loaded 45 649, 88 mt 19 670, 28 mt DEADFREIGHT 25 979. 60 mt mt On behalf of my Owners/ Charters and any or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I hold You and Your Principals responsible for the above calculated Dead Freight. Yours truly: Accepted/ Received: Capt. A. Ivanov MASTER ExxonMobil Representative TO: G.A.T.X. M.T. ARBAT GLEFI SHIPPING V CO TO:WHOM IT MAY CONCERN CARGO: GASOLINE BLENDEDSTOCK PORT : GALENA PARK DATE : 19th of June, 2000 QUANTITY: ABOUT 70 000 BBLS BERTH: GATX No 2 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, DELAY DUE TO SHORE LINE DISPLACEMENT CALCULATION / DELAY DUE TO LOW DISCHARGING RATE/ DELAY DUE TO AWAITING FOR SHORE READINESS This is to inform you that on behalf of my principals and owners, I hold you responsible for the following and the consequences which may arise therefrom, at the same time reserving the right to revert on the above subject. LINE DISPLACEMENT CALCULATION. The vessel carried out line displacement calculation as per terminal requirements: From 18/06-00 20.10 to 18/06-00 20.20 Commenced discharging from one cargo tank for shore line displacement calculation From 18/06-00 20.20 to 18/06-00 20.35 Shore line displacement calculation. LOW DISCHARGING RATE Ship’s pumps capable of maintaining a manifolds pressure at least 100 pci with discharge rate 16000 bbls/hr ( 3 cargo tanks for discharging at this terminal ) and time 7 hrs by 4x14” cargo lines. Terminal capability to maintain dispressure 100 pci with max rate 7000 bbls/hr and provided 1 x 8” cargo hose only. Actual discharging rate 7000 bbls/hr, bulkdischarging time //////////hrs, delay /////// hrs. The discharging facilities are unsufficient to utilize my vessel’s full discharging capacity. DELAY DUE TO AWAITING FOR READINESS From 18/06-00 18.00 to 18/06-00 18.35 Awaiting for shore Readiness to discharge gasoline. From 18/06-00 19.30 to 18/06-00 20.10 . Therefore, on behalf of my Owners/ Charterers and any or all other third parties that are may be concerned, I formally protest and hold your principals responsible for the consequences, if any, caused Due to this delays. I further reserve the rights of my Owners / Charterers to refer to this matter at a Later date, time or place. Yours truly, Capt. A. Ivanov Received :…………………………………………. MASTE To: ExxonMobil, Australia To: BHP Billiton To: Raffles Shipbrokers Singapore To: Whom it may concern M.T. A R B A T Glefi Shipping Vco. Voyage No 0110 Port : Melbourne Berth : Gellibrand pier Cargo : Main Column Bottoms Date : October 01 , 2001 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the loading operations at Gellibrand pier the vessel notes protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. Re: DELAY/ AN EXTRA EXPENSES Vessel was waiting for cargo documents from September 29th, 2001 11.00 hrs Lt till October 01, 2001 1930 Lt and as per Shippers instruction was shifted from Gellibrand pier to inner road anchorage on September 29 st, 2001 from 14.30 hrs Lt till 15.05 hrs Lt. On behalf of my Owners/ Charters and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I am holding you, other interested parties responsible for all delays, expenses, loss and damages caused by awaiting for cargo documents, shifting from berth to anchorage, an extra pilot, pilot boat services, etc. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/ Charters to refer to this matter at a later date, time and place. For details please see Statement of Fact port of Melbourne, ExxonMobil writing order. Yours Faithfully, Received: Captain A. Ivanov MASTER …………………………………… ExxonMobil Representative (Date/Name) To: ExxonMobil, Australia To: Whom it may concern M.T. A R B A T Glefi Shipping Vco. Voyage No 0110 Port : Melbourne Berth : Gellibrand pier Cargo : Main Column Bottoms Date : September 29, 2001 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the loading operations at Gellibrand pier the vessel notes protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. Re: AWAITING FOR SHORE READINESS The vessel was waiting for loading as per Terminal reasons: From 25.09.01 08.30 hrs Lt till 25.09.01 12.05 hrs Lt. From 27.09.01 11.25 hrs Lt till 27.09.01 17.00 hrs Lt. From 27.09.01 17.45 hrs Lt till 28.09.01 15.35 hrs Lt. On behalf of my Owners/ Charters and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I formally protested and hold your principals responsible for the consequences, if any, caused due to above delays. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/ Charters to refer to this matter at a later date, time and place. Yours Faithfully, Received: Captain A. Ivanov MASTER …………………………………… ExxonMobil Representative (Date/Name) TO: BRITISH AIRWAYS M.T. ARBAT TO: E S S O, Fawley TO:WHOM IT MAY CONCERN GLEFI SHIPPING V CO CARGO: JET A 1 PORT : Southampton, Fawley, U.K. DATE : August 30, 2000 QUANTITY: About 34 000 cbm BERTH: ESSO, Nr 2 Voyage 2012 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, DELAYS DUE LOW DISCHARGING RATE This is to inform you that on behalf of my principals and owners, I hold you responsible for the following and the consequences which may arise therefrom, at the same time reserving the right to revert on the above subject. Ship’s pumps capable of maintaining a manifolds pressure 100 pci with discharge rate 3 400 cbm/hr and time 10 hrs 00 min’s by 4x14” cargo lines. Terminal capability to maintain dispressure 138 pci. Actual discharging pressure at ship’s manifolds and rate were reduced by shore request: From 28/0800 01.25 to 28/0800 0230 shore request to discharge 1 ft from each cargo tank with loq rate; On 28/0800 at 1520 shore request to reduce discharge rate upto 700 cbm/hr;p On 28/0800 at 1835 shore request to reduce discharge rate upto 400 cbm/hr; On 28/0800 at 1900 shore request to reduce discharge rate upto 300 cbm/hr; On 28/0800 at 2030 shore request to reduce pressure at ships manifolds upto 1 kg/cm2; On 29/0800 at 2030 shore request to increase discharge rate upto 200 cbm/hr; On 29/0800 at 0615 shore request to reduce pressure at ships manifolds upto 1 kg/cm2; Average discharge rate 654 cbm/hr, bulkdischarging time 52 hrs 05 min’s, delay 42 hrs 05 min’s. The vessel experienced severe high back pressure during all time of discharging. The discharging facilities provided by terminal 2 x 8 “ cargo hoses are unsufficient to utilize my vessel’s full discharging capacity.Therefore, on behalf of my Owners/ Charterers and any or all other third parties that are may be concerned, I formally protest and hold you principals responsible for the consequences, if any, caused Due to this delays. I further reserve the rights of my Owners / Charterers to refer to this matter at a Later date, time or place. Yours truly, Received :…………………………………………. Capt. A.Ivanov MASTER Consignee representative TO: Santos Ltd, Bonython TO: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN M.T. ARBAT GLEFI SHIPPING V CO LIBERIAN FLAG, MONROVIA PORT : Bonython, Australia VOYAGE No 0110 Berth : T - Head DATE : September 18th, 2001 CARGO : Cooper Crude Oil. LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the loading operation at Santos terminal, T-Head berth, the vessel notes protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at a time and place convenie On behalf of my Owners/ Charters and any or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I hold You and Your Principals responsible for the consequences, if any, caused for the above. For information please see Statement of Fact dated September 18th, 2001 port of Bonython. Yours sincerely, …………………………. Capt. A. Ivanov MASTER Received/ Accepted: …………………………………….. Santos Ltd Representative TO: BHP Transport TO: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Port: Kembla, Australia M.T. ARBAT GLEFI SHIPPING V CO VOYAGE NO 01/09 Date: September 12, 2001 LETTER OF PROTEST RE: DELAYS/ LOSSES Dear Sirs, Please be advised that my vessel m.t. ARBAT has arrived at port of Mumbai, India , anchored at road, Notice Of Readiness tendered from road on July 28th, 2001 at 12.15 LT and was waiting for the berth at anchor from above said time till July 31 st, 2001 19.00 LT. The Pir Pau berth had been occupied by mv “ SAN SEBASTINE “, mv “ SUTRA TIGA “ and mv “ IGLOO TOR “. On behalf of my Owners/Charterers and any all other third parties that are or may be concerned I formally protest and hold you and your principals responsible for the consequences caused due to these waiting for berth. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/Charterers to refer to this matter at later date, time or place. For details please see statement of fact port of Mumbai, India dated on August 02nd, 2001. Yours truly, Capt . A. Ivanov Received by: …………………….. MASTER Consignee representative To: BHP Transport To: Whom it may concern Port Glefi Shipping VCo Liberian flag,Monrovia Voyage No 0109 : Kembla, Australia Berth : Oil Berth Cargo : Fuel Oil, Gas Oil Date: September 12, 2001 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the discharging operations the vessel notes Protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. DELAYS/ LOSSES Please be advised according to cargo handling plan has been presented by BHP representative cargo should be discharged one-by-one: Gas Oil and Fuel Oil. Due to Charter/ Terminal request a special sequence of discharge of parcels of cargo vessel may not be able to comply with CP warranty and Terminal/ Charter is considered liable for all delays/ losses resulting therefrom. On behalf of my Owners and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I formally protested and hold your principals responsible for the consequences, if any, caused due to delays/ losses resulting not concurrent of discharge. I further reserve the rights of my Owners to refer to this matter at a later date, time and place. Yours Faithfully, Capt. A. Ivanov MASTER Accepted/ Received: John Haggany BHP representative 12.09.2001 To: PETROECUADOR To: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN M.T. A R B A T Port: La Libertad, Ecuador Berth: Petroindustrial, La Libertad Cargo : Naphtha in quantity about 147 000 bbls Date: July 23, 2000 LETTER Glefi Shipping V Co Liberian flag, Monrovia Voyage No 2011 TC/Voyage No 8 OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the loading operations at terminal Petroindustrial La Libertad, the vessel notes protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. LOAD HAS BEEN DELAYED DUE TO SHIPPER INSTRUCTIONS TO BE FOLLOWED FOR THE SHIPMENT OF NAPHTHA From 21.07.00 18.20 to 21.07.00 19.42 Discharging water from ship’s slop tank for Shore line flushing From 21.07.00 19.42 to 21.07.00 20.30 Awaiting for shore readiness From 21.07.00 20.30 to 21.07.00 21.30 Loading flushing water from shore line into Ship’s slop tank From 21.07.00 21.30 to 21.07.00 21.45 Awaiting for shore readiness From 21.07.00 21.45 to 21.07.00 22.40 Loading flushing naphtha into cargo tank 8 From 23.07.00 14.50 to 23.07.00 15.50 Discharging flushing naphtha from cargo tk 8 From 23.07.00 15.50 to 23.07.00 17.15Discharging flushing water from ship’s slop tk On behalf of my Owners/ Charterer’s and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I formally protested and hold your principals responsible for the consequences and expences, if any, caused due to delay as vessel to be followed to shipper’s instructions for the shipment of naphtha and awaiting for shore readiness at time of that operations. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/ Charterer’s to refer to this matter at a later date, time and place. For details please see timesheet, shipper’s instructions. Yours faithfully, Received : …………………………………… PETROECUADOR representative (Date/Name) Capt. A. Ivanov MASTER To: TANKSTORE, Singapore To: ExxonMobil Singapore To: Raffles Shipbrokers Singapore To: Whom it may concern M.T. A R B A T Glefi Shipping Vco. Voyage No 0110 Port : Singapore Cargo : Main Column Bottoms, 19670mt Date : October 15, 2001 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the discharging operations at Tankstore terminal, berth No2, the vessel notes protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. Re: Cargo Lines Flush The vessel carried out cargo lines flushing as per the terminal requirements: 1. Loaded about 500 mt line flush cargo from shore tank on board prior to discharging from 15.10.01 0220 hrs till 15.10.01 0315 hrs; 2. Returned 500 mt line flush cargo on completion of discharging into shore tank from 15.10.01 hrs till 15.10.01 1810 hrs. On behalf of my Owners/ Charters and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I formally protested and hold your principals responsible for the delays, consequences, if any, caused cargo line flush as per terminal request due to above said operations not comply with CP Arbat/BHP 31.07.01. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/ Charters to refer to this matter at a later date, time and place. For details please see Tankstore discharging operation order dated October 15, 2001. Yours Faithfully, Accepted/ Received: Captain A. Ivanov MASTER ……………………………………. Tankstore terminal Representative TO:TEXACO INTERNATIONAL TRADER M.T. ARBAT TO: TERMINAL GATX, PASADENA, TX SHIPPING V CO TO:WHOM IT MAY CONCERN CARGO: GASOLINE S 87, QUANTITY ABT 39300 CBM PORT: PASADENA, HOUSTON, TX DATE: 15TH MAY, 2000 GLEFI LETTER OF PROTEST DEAR SIRS, DELAYS DUE TO WAITING FOR SHORE READINESS/LINE DISPLACEMENT/ RESTRICTED DISCHARGE PRESSURE. THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT ON BEHALF OF MY PRINCIPALS AND OWNERS, I HOLD YOU RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AND THE CONSEQUENCES WHICH MAY ARISE THEREFROM, AT THE SAME TIME RESERVING THE RIGHT TO REVERT ON THE ABOVE SUBJE AWAITNG FOR SHORE READINESS. THE VESSEL WAS WAITING FOR SHORE READINESS FROM 14/05-00 13.50 TO 14/05-00 16.10 15/05-00 14.10 15/05-00 15.50 LINE DISPLACEMENT. THE VESSEL CARRIED OUT LINE DISPLACEMENT AS PER THE TERMINAL REQUIREMENTS 0N 14/05-00 FROM16.10 TO 16.50. DURING THIS PERIOD THE VESSEL WAS RESTRICTED IN HER FULL DISCHARGING CAPABILITY, DISCHARGING WAS SUSPENDED BY SHORE REQUEST. RESTRICTED DISCHARGE PRESSURE AS PER TERMINAL REASONS. SHIP’S PUMPS CAPABLE OF MAINTAINING A MANIFOLDS PRESSURE OF AT LEAST 7.2 KG/CM2. VESSEL WAS RESTRICTED LOW MAX ALLOWED PRESSURE AT SHIP’S CARGO MANIFOLDS 6.3 KG/CM2. AS A RESULT OF ABOVE SAID RESTRICTIONS THE BULK PUMPING OUT TIME 28 HRS 20 MIN’S, INSTEAD OF SHIP’S ABILITY 14 HRS. THEREFORE, ON BEHALF OF MY OWNERS/CHARTERERS AND ANY OR ALL OTHER THIRD PARTIES THAT ARE MAY BE CONCERNED, I FORMALLY PROTEST AND HOLD YOU PRINCIPALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSEQUENCES, IF ANY, CAUSED DUE TO THIS DELAYS. I FURTHER RESERVE THE RIFGTS OF MY OWNERS/CHARTERER’S TO REFER TO THIS MATTER AT A LATER DATE, TIME OR PLACE. YOURS TRULY, CAPT. A. IVANOV MASTER RECEIVED: To: EXXONMOBIL ASIA PACIFIC PTE LTD To: EXXONMOBIL FAIRFAX, VA.USA To: WATERWAY PETROLEUM LTD To: PREMIUM NAFTA PRODUCTS To: Whom it may concern M.T. A R B A T Glefi Shipping Vco. Voyage No 0113 Port : Singapore Cargo : Fuel Oil M 100 12 146 cbm Date : November 21, 2001 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the discharging operations at ExxonMobil terminal, berth No 4, the vessel notes protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. DELAY DUE TO SLOW DISCHARGING RATE Ship’s pumps capable of maintaining a manifolds pressure at least 7 kg with discharge rate 2 550 cbm/ hr for the 3 cargo tanks and produced discharging within 05 hrs 00 min’s. Vessel maintained discharging pressure at ship’s manifolds 7 kg but the attained average discharging rate was 1114 cbm/hr only. Bulk discharging time consisted 10 hrs 55 min’s. Delay 05 hrs 55 min’s. The discharging facilities are un-sufficient to utilize my vessel’s full discharging capacity. Therefore, on behalf of my Owner and any or all other third parties that are may be concerned, I formally protest and hold you principals responsible for the consequences, if any, caused due to this delay. I further reserve the rights of my Owner to refer to this matter at a later date, time or place. Yours truly, Received /Accepted Capt. A.Ivanov …………………………………… MASTER ExxonMobil Terminal representative ( Date, time ) M.T. ARBAT PORT OF DUNKIRK, FRANCE GLEFI SHIPPING V CO DATE:27 TH OF MARCH, 2000 VOYAGE NR 2004 TO:CONSIGNEE TOTAL RAFFINAGE DISTRIBUTION S.A. TERMINAL RAFFINIERIE DE FLANDRES WHOM IT MAY CONCERN LETTER OF PROTEST RE: WAITING FOR A BERTH PLEASE BE ADVISED MY GOOD VESSEL M.T. ARBAT WAS WAITING FOR A BERTH FROM 23/03-00 17.00 LT TILL 24/03-00 10.30 LT. A BERTH HAD BEEN OCCUPIED BY MT “DALI”. ON BEHALF OF MY OWNER/CHARTERER I HOLD YOU RESPONSIBLE FOR SHIP’S DELAY, ADDITIONAL EXPENCES THAT RESULT FROM SAID DELAY AND RESERVE THE RIGHT OF MY PRINCIPALS TO REFER TO THIS MATTER AT A FUTURE DATE. PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS LETTER. YOURS FAUTHFULLY, A. IVANOV MASTER OF THE MT ARBAT To: ExxonMobil, Australia To: Whom It May Concern Port : Melbourne Terminal/Berth : Gellibrand pier Cargo : Cooper Crude Oil M.T. A R B A T Glefi Shipping V Co Liberian flag,Monrovia Date : September 23 , 2001 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the discharging operations at Gellibrand pier, the vessel notes protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. Re: Letter of Protest Please be advised according to Letter of Protest dated 21/09/01 signed by Ray Dickson, shore officer 495, Mobil Oil Australia, quote vessel allowed the overflow of cargo into Spill tray and fully contained on starboard side manifold due to gasket/flange failure. As a result of this overflow of cargo, cargo operations were suspended from 0940 to 1020 while clean up operations were undertaken and manifold blank flanged unquote. The vessel not agree with terms “the overflow of cargo “, “ fully contained”, “while clean up operations”. At 0940 insignificant cargo leakage was observed on cargo line No 3 starboard manifold through blank gasket into Spill tray. Cargo operations suspended. Capacity of Spill tray is 10.52 cbm. Insignificant leakage of oil was collected into Spill tray and discharged into port Slop tank. Quantity of slops the same before and after discharging according to Slop tank certificates. So quantity of oil had been spilled and discharged from starboard Spill tray into port slop tank immeasurable and insignificant and cargo operations suspended for gasket renewing only. On behalf of my Owners/ Charterer’s and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I formally protested and hold your principals responsible for the consequences, if any, caused due to not correct information in Letter of Protest. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/ Charterer’s to refer to this matter at a later date, time and place. For details please see Slop certificates dated September 21 , 2001. Yours Faithfully, Received: …………………………………… ExxonMobil Representative Capt. A. Ivanov MASTER (Date/Name) TO: PEMEX, TAMPICO TO: INSPECTORS CAMIN CARGO CC: AGENSIA VARGAS TO:WHOM IT MAY CONCERN M.T. ARBAT GLEFI SHIPPING v Co LIBERIAN FLAG, MONROVIA DATE: 24TH June, 2000 Kindly ask you to pass the following NOTICE to shipper , terminal and inspectors And hope copy with acknowledgements will be on board on arrival. N O T I C E Dear Sirs, This is to inform you that my good vessel expected to load cargo of grade CACTUS NUEVO NAPHTHA at your port. I hereby give you formal notice that before loading vessel must be supplied with MSDS and CERTIFICATE OF QUALITY for the above cargo. Letter of protest will be ussued if above documents will not be on board before commence cargo operations and I hold you responsible for the delays and consequences which may arise therefrom. Yours truly, Capt. A. Ivanov MASTER TO: PEMEX, TAMPICO CC: AGENSIA VARGAS M.T. ARBAT GLEFI SHIPPING V Co TO:WHOM IT MAY CONCERN MONROVIA LIBERIAN FLAG, DATE: 24TH June, 2000 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, This is to inform you that on behalf of my principals and owners, I hold you responsible for the following and the consequences which may arise therefrom, at the same time reserving the right to revert on the above subject. My good vessel has loaded cargo Diesel oil at your terminal PEMEX, berth No 2 in quantity About 100 000 bbls. Terminal has not provided with MSDS my vessel before, during and upon complition of Loading instead of several vessel’s requires. Therefore, on behalf of my Owners/ Charterers and any or all other third parties that are may be concerned, I formally protest and hold your principals responsible for the consequences, if any, caused due to loading and sailing without MSDS. I further reserve the rights of my Owners / Charterers to refer to this matter at a Later date, time or place. Yours truly, Capt. A. Ivanov MASTER Received:……………………………. …………………………….. TO : TEXACO TO : WHOM IT MAY CONCERN M.T. ARBAT GLEFI SHIPPING V Co Port: NEW YORK, USA Voyage No 2006 DATE: 05th MAY, 2000 Gasoline Cargo Reformulated Dear Sirs, I am in receipt of Receiver’s Letter Of Protest concerning a shortage of cargo Reformulated Gasoline in quantity ……………………………….. . In that respect, I wish to inform you that ullages taken before discharge conjointly with Chief Officer and SAYBOLT Surveyor were found to be in conformity with ullaging report established at loading Port Pembroke, UK dated 23rd April, 2000. Furthermore, upon inspection carried out after discharge by SAYBOLT Surveyor it has been Noticed that all pumpable cargo had been taken out by the vessel. On the other hand, in accordance with the carriage contract the Carrier does not take part in Performing shore measurements at both loading and discharging ports, and the Carrier cannot be Responsible for shortage of cargo ascertained as per shore measurements and for correctness of same. Therefore, for the above reasons, in both Qwner’s/Charterer’s and Ship’s interest , I am Denying Receiver’s protest. Faithfully Yours Capt. A. Ivanov by:…………………………………….. Received MASTER ……………………………………… To: PEMEX,PARARITOS ,MEXICO To: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Port: Coatzacoalcos, Mexico Berth:Pajaritos, PEMEX No 4west Cargo Loading: Diesel in Qty abt 90 000 BBLS Cargo discharging about 805 cbm DATE: June 29 , 2000 LETTER M.T. A R B A T Glefi Shipping VCo Liberian flag,Monrovia Voyage No 2010 TC/Voy 7 OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the loading/discharging operations that required P.M.I. Comercio International dated June 27, 2000 at Pemex Terminal, Pajaritos, QUOTE we hereby confirm that the vessel shall proceed to make the internal transfer of all the cargo loaded as first foot to only one tank, in order to discharge the same either to shore tank or barges according with Pemex Terminal’s instructions. We request the above as the product do not meet the contractual quality UNQUOTE, the vessel notes Protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. DELAYS DUE TO LOADING, DISCHARGING OF CARGO DO NOT MEET THE CONTRACTUAL QUALITY, CARGO TANKS INSPECTION. From 26/06-00 14.00 to 26/06-00 14.15 loading of diesel oil From 27/06-00 01.20 to 27/06-00 03.00 loading of diesel oil qty about 805 cbm From 27/06-00 17.50 to 27/06-00 19.25 discharging ashore of diesel oil From 27/06-00 19.25 to 27/06-00 19.50 cargo tanks inspection On behalf of my Owners/ Charterer’s and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I formally protested and hold your principals responsible for the consequences, if any, caused due to delays for loading,discharging cargo diesel oil as product do not meet the contractual quality, cargo tanks inspection. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/ Charterer’s to refer to this matter at a later date, time And place. For details please see timesheet. Yours Faithfully, Received: …………………………………… Capt. A. Ivanov MASTER PEMEX representative (Date/Name) To: UNION TEXAS PAKISTAN To: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN M.T. A R B A T Port: Bin Qasim Berth: MW-1 Cargo : BADIN CRUDE OIL, ………………….. cbm Date: JUNE 27, 2001 LETTER Glefi Shipping VCo Liberian flag,Monrovia Voyage No 0106 OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the loading operations at terminal MW-1, the vessel notes Protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. SLOW LOADING RATE Vessel able to load cargo Badin Crude Oil with max rate 3400 cbm / hr and time ………. hrs ………. mins. Terminal provided with average rate …………… cbm/hr and actual time ………. hrs ………. mins. Delay ………… hrs ……….. mins On behalf of my Owners/ Charterer’s and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I formally protested and hold your principals responsible for the consequences, if any, caused delays due to slow loading rate. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/ Charterer’s to refer to this matter at a later date, time And place. For details please see timesheet. Yours Faithfully, Received: …………………………………… UNION TEXACO representative Mr. A. Samad 27.06.2001 PORT OF VENTSPILS, LATVIA BERTH No 30 DATE: APRIL 04, 2000 Capt. A. Ivanov MASTER M.T. ARBAT GLEFI SHIPPING V CO LIBERIAN FLAG, MONROVIA TO: CROWN PETROLEUM CORP.LTD. PORT OF VENTSPILS, LATVIA WHOM IT MAY CONCERN LETTER OF PROTEST RE: DELAY OF LOADING DEAR SIRS, PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT MY GOOD VESSEL WAS READY TO LOAD CARGO UNLEADED GASOLINE ABOUT 40 500 M.T. AT YOUR TERMINAL WITH RATE 3 400 CBM PER HOUR. YOU HAD BEEN INFORMED BY N.O.R. VESSEL LOADED ABOUT 55305 CBM OF CARGO, ACTUAL LOADING RATE WAS 1554 CBM PER HOUR. DURATION OF LOADING 35,6 HRS INSTEAD OF 16,3 HRS. SO THE DELAY IN LOADING HAVE BEEN OCCURRED AND FOR WHICH, TAKING IN ACCOUNT THE ABOVESAID I HOLD YOU FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR DELAY WITH ALL CONSEQUENCES WHICH MAY ARISE WHEREFROM. YOURS FAITHFULLY, A. IVANOV MASTER TO:PEMEX TO: PMI TRADING TO:WHOM IT MAY CONCERN CARGO: GASOLINE , QUANTITY ABT 300 000 US BBLS PORT: TUXPAN, VERACRUZ. MEXICO TERMINAL: S.B.M. No 1 DATE: 26th MAY, 2000 M.T. ARBAT GLEFI SHIPPING V CO LETTER OF PROTEST DEAR SIRS, DELAYS DUE TO WAITING FOR SHORE READINESS/ DISCHARGING BY ONE CARGO LINE. THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT ON BEHALF OF MY PRINCIPALS AND OWNERS, I HOLD YOU RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AND THE CONSEQUENCES WHICH MAY ARISE THEREFROM, AT THE SAME TIME RESERVING THE RIGHT TO REVERT ON THE ABOVE SUBJECT. AWAITNG FOR SHORE READINESS. THE VESSEL WAS WAITING FOR SHORE READINESS FROM 26/05-00 03.25 TO 03.55 DISCHARGING BY ONE CARGO LINE DISCHARGING OF GASOLINE PEMEX BY 1 CARGO HOSE OWING TO SHORE REQUEST FROM 25/05-00 10.40 TO 12.45 THEREFORE, ON BEHALF OF MY OWNERS/CHARTERERS AND ANY OR ALL OTHER THIRD PARTIES THAT ARE MAY BE CONCERNED, I FORMALLY PROTEST AND HOLD YOU PRINCIPALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSEQUENCES, IF ANY, CAUSED DUE TO THIS DELAYS. I FURTHER RESERVE THE RIFGTS OF MY OWNERS/CHARTERER’S TO REFER TO THIS MATTER AT A LATER DATE, TIME OR PLACE. YOURS TRULY, CAPT. A. IVANOV MASTER RECEIVED: ……………………………………….. PEMEX REPRESENTATIVE M.T. ARBAT PORT OF VENTSPILS, LATVIA GLEFI SHIPPING V CO BERTH: NR 30 LIBERIAN FLAG, MONROVIA DATE: APRIL 04, 2000 TO: CARGO SHIPPER CROWN PETROLEUM CORP. LTD. WHOM IT MAY CONCERN RE: LOADING AT PORT OF VENTSPILS PLEASE BE ADVISED M.T. ARBAT HAS ARRIVED AT PORT OF VENTSPILS FOR LOADING CARGO UNLEADED GASOLINE UPTO MAX QUANTITY ABOUT 40 500 M.T. ON ARRIVAL 470 M.T. OF DIRTY BALLAST WAS ON BOARD IN SLOP TANK PORT SIDE FOR DISCHARGING ASHORE. SLOP TANKS WERE PLANNED FOR CARGO UN.GASOLINE. VESSEL WAS READY FOR SIMULTANEOUS OPERATION LOADING OF THE CARGO AND DISCHARGING DIRTY BALLAST. CARGO AND SLOP TANKS HAD BEEN INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED FOR LOADING BY SGS SURVEYORS AND PORT REPRESENTATIVE UPON COMPLITION DISCHARGING OF DIRTY BALLAST ONLY. YOURS FAITHFULLY A. IVANOV MASTER OF THE M.T. ARBAT To: TEXACO LTD To:Whom it may concern M.T. ARBAT Glefi Shipping V Co Port:Pembroke, UK Terminal: TEXACO, Berth No 1 Date: 23rd April, 2000 LETTER OF PROTEST RE: SEDIMENTS IN MANIFOLDS LINE No 2 Dear Sirs, Unknown sediment of shore origin has been detected into ship’s cargo line No 2 on completion of loading of the first grade of cargo Gasoline S87 by ship’s cargo lines NoS 2 and 3, and cargo arms disconnection. At the same time cargo line No 3 is clean. Samples from cargo tanks and cargo survey not indicate any sediment into cargo tanks. However a more correct assessment of any sediments will be possible at discharge port because of insufficient settling time on completion of loading. Herewith I note protest against the sediment found in the manifold’s line No 2, and sediments that will be possible at discharge port, and on behalf of my Owners/Charterer’s I hold you responsible for all or any claims, costs and losses they or either of them may suffer. On behalf of my Owner/Charterer’s I further reserve the right to take all such further actions as may be considered necessary to protect interests of those parties. Yours Faithfully, Received: ………………………… …………………………………. Capt. A. Ivanov MASTER ( Date/ Nmae ) TO : PDVSA PETROLEO Y GAS M.T. ARBAT TO : WHOM IT MAY CONCERN GLEFI SHIPPING V CO TERMINAL: EL PALITO MARINE TERMINAL, BERTH NR 4 CARGO : JET A-1 QTY : ABOUT 160 000 BBLS PORT : EL PALITO, VENEZUELA DATE : August 11, 2000 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, DELAY DUE TO SHORE LINE DISPLACEMENT CALCULATION /AWAITING FOR SHORE READINESS/ AWAITING FOR CARGO DOCUMENTS This is to inform you that on behalf of my principals and owners, I hold you responsible for the following and the consequences which may arise therefrom, at the same time reserving the right to revert on the above subject . SHORE LINE DISPLACEMENT CALCULATION. The vessel carried out line displacement calculation as per terminal requirements: From 09/08-00 10.15 to 09/08-00 11.25 Commenced loading into one cargo tank for shore line displacement calculation From 09/08-00 11.25 to 09/08-00 12.10 Shore line displacement calculation. DELAY DUE TO AWAITING FOR SHORE READINESS From 08/08-00 18.30 to 08/08-00 19.45 Awaiting for shore readiness From 08/08-00 21.00 to 08/08-00 21.40 Awaiting for shore readiness From 08/08-00 21.50 to 09/08-00 10.15 Awaiting for shore readiness Loading suspended by shore request. Awaiting for shore readiness to load Jet A-1: From 09/08-00 15.45 to 09/08-00 16.50 From 10/08-00 02.15 to 10/08-00 04.15 From 10/08-00 07.10 to 11/08-00 00.40 From 11/08-00 04.35 to 11/08-00 06.25 DELAY DUE TO AWAITING FOR CARGO DOCUMENTS From 11/08-00 to 11/08-00 Awaiting for cargo documents. Therefore, on behalf of my Owners/ Charterers and any or all other third parties that are may be concerned, I formally protest and hold you principals responsible for the consequences, if any, caused due to this delays. I further reserve the rights of my Owners / Charterers to refer to this matter at a later date, time or place. Yours truly, Capt. A. Ivanov R eceived :……………………………. MASTER PDVSA representative To: Fouji Oil Terminal To: BP Oil International To: EastPort Chartering, Singapore To: Whom it may concern M.T. A R B A T Glefi Shipping Vco. Voyage No 0112 Port : Bin Qasim, Pakistan Cargo : Badin Crude Oil Date : November 07, 2001 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the loading operations at FOTCO Terminal port of Bin Qasim, vessel notes protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. Re: Cargo Short Delivery According to CP ARBAT/ MOA dated 21.09.01 commodity of Low Sulphur Waxy Residue total quantity to be loaded: to load as close as possible to 220 000 bbls not exceeding 220 000 bbls. Actual quantity loaded is 214 174. 162 bbls. Shortage 5 825. 838 bbls. On behalf of my Owners/ Charters and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I formally protested and hold your principals responsible for the expenses, consequences, if any, caused 5 825. 838 bbls of cargo short delivery and not complying with above said CP. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/ Charters to refer to this matter at a later date, time and place. Yours Faithfully, Captain A. Ivanov MASTER Accepted: ……………………………………. PERTAMINA Representative To: OILTANKING, Singapore M.T. A R B A T Glefi Shipping VCo Liberian flag,Monrovia Voyage No 0101 To: Whom it may concern Port : Berth : Cargo : Date : Singapore No 2 Fuel Oil February 01, 2001 LETTER OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the loading operations at OILTANKING, berth 2, the vessel notes Protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. DELAY DUE TO AWAITING FOR BERTH From January 30, 2001 12.30 LT to January 31, 2001 01.55 LT On behalf of my Owners/ Charterer’s and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I formally protested and hold your principals responsible for the consequences, if any, caused due to awaiting for berth. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/ Charterer’s to refer to this matter at a later date, time And place. For details please see statement and NOR dated January 30, 2001. Yours Faithfully, …………………………………. Capt. A. Ivanov MASTER …………………………………. OILTANKING representative (Date/Name) To: ExxonMobil, Australia To: BHP Billiton To: Whom it may concern Port : Melbourne Berth : Gellibrand pier M.T. A R B A T Glefi Shipping Vco. Voyage No 0110 Cargo : Main Column Bottoms Date : September 27, 2001 STATEMENT Dear Sirs, With reference to the loading operations at Gellibrand pier the vessel notes statement for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. Re: BUNKER Please be advised that according to Charter Party ARBAT/ BHP dated 31.07.01 vessel fixed with option “ no tank cleaning required if backhaul exercised “. As per shipper/ terminal order the following cargo tanks operations were done: purging, washing of the cargo tank No 1 and de-slopping. The following bunker had been spent for above said operations: IFO = 0.5 mt, MDO = 1.3 mt. On behalf of my Owners/ Charters and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, I formally hold your principals responsible for expenses of bunker consumed. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/ Charter’s to refer to this matter at a later date, time and place. Yours Faithfully, Captain A. Ivanov MASTER Accepted: …………………………………… ExxonMobil Representative (Date/Name) TO:TEXACO INTERNATIONAL TRADER TO: TERMINAL GATX, PASADENA, TX TO:WHOM IT MAY CONCERN CARGO: GASOLINE S 87, QUANTITY ABT 39300 CBM PORT: PASADENA, HOUSTON, TX DATE: 15TH MAY, 2000 M.T. ARBAT GLEFI SHIPPING V CO LETTER OF PROTEST DEAR SIRS, DELAYS DUE TO WAITING FOR SHORE READINESS/LINE DISPLACEMENT/ RESTRICTED DISCHARGE PRESSURE. THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT ON BEHALF OF MY PRINCIPALS AND OWNERS, I HOLD YOU RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FOLLOWING AND THE CONSEQUENCES WHICH MAY ARISE THEREFROM, AT THE SAME TIME RESERVING THE RIGHT TO REVERT ON THE ABOVE SUBJECT. AWAITNG FOR SHORE READINESS. THE VESSEL WAS WAITING FOR SHORE READINESS FROM 14/05-00 13.50 TO 14/05-00 16.10 15/05-00 14.10 TO 15/05-00 15.50 LINE DISPLACEMENT. THE VESSEL CARRIED OUT LINE DISPLACEMENT AS PER THE TERMINAL REQUIREMENTS 0N 14/05-00 FROM16.10 TO 16.50. DURING THIS PERIOD THE VESSEL WAS RESTRICTED IN HER FULL DISCHARGING CAPABILITY, DISCHARGING WAS SUSPENDED BY SHORE REQUEST. RESTRICTED DISCHARGE PRESSURE AS PER TERMINAL REASONS. SHIP’S PUMPS CAPABLE OF MAINTAINING A MANIFOLDS PRESSURE OF AT LEAST 7.2 KG/CM2. VESSEL WAS RESTRICTED LOW MAX ALLOWED PRESSURE AT SHIP’S CARGO MANIFOLDS 6.3 KG/CM2. AS A RESULT OF ABOVE SAID RESTRICTIONS THE BULK PUMPING OUT TIME 28 HRS 20 MIN’S, INSTEAD OF SHIP’S ABILITY 14 HRS. THEREFORE, ON BEHALF OF MY OWNERS/CHARTERERS AND ANY OR ALL OTHER THIRD PARTIES THAT ARE MAY BE CONCERNED, I FORMALLY PROTEST AND HOLD YOU PRINCIPALS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSEQUENCES, IF ANY, CAUSED DUE TO THIS DELAYS. I FURTHER RESERVE THE RIFGTS OF MY OWNERS/CHARTERER’S TO REFER TO THIS MATTER AT A LATER DATE, TIME OR PLACE. YOURS TRULY, CAPT. A. IVANOV RECEIVED: MASTER …………………………………………. To: PETROLEUM MARKETING INT. To: WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Port: Willemstad, Curacao Berth: ISLA marine terminal,berth Nr6 Cargo : JET A-1 Date: August 12, 2000 LETTER M.T. A R B A T Glefi Shipping V Co Liberian flag, Monrovia Voyage No 2012 TC/Voyage No 9 OF PROTEST Dear Sirs, With reference to the loading operations at terminal ISLA marine terminal, the vessel notes protest for the following, and reserves the right to extend it at time and place convenient. UNDERLOADING In accordance with the instructions from my Charterers/Owners my vessel is scheduled to load cargo of JET A-1 72 000 bbls at your terminal. Cargo operations stopped by shore and cargo actually loaded bbls. Underloading bbls. As a consequence of your failure to supply my vessel with the 72 000 bbls of cargo on behalf of my Owners/ Charterer’s and or all other third parties that are or may be concerned, if any, I formally protested and hold your principals responsible for the consequences and expences, if any, caused due to these underloading of bbls of cargo JET A-1. I further reserve the rights of my Owners/ Charterer’s to refer to this matter at a later date, time And place. Yours Faithfully, Capt. A. Ivanov MASTER Received: …………………………………… Shippers representative (Date/Name) Antwerpen, 15th June, 2001 m/v “STK 1012” To Stevedoreing Company, Shippers, Insurance Company, Receivers and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: damage of the HARVESTER TX66 NEW HOLLAND Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that HARVESTER TX66 NEW HOLLAND, Tipo 322321600, Teli 000744, Anno 2001, Chassi No. 501213048 has badly dented it’s aft part before loading on the deck of m/v “STK 1012”. Dented part are fixed on videotape. In view of the above I shall no bear responsibility for the damage caused and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the Consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Dordrecht, 25th October, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” Whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: delay of loading Dear Sirs, This is to inform you that during hold inspection rain have started and in reason of this holds have become wet and it was not possible to start loading. As the delay of loading was entirely due to reason beyond our control, we cannot be responsible for it. Yours faithfully, N.N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Chatham, 12th June, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” Whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: damage of the cargo of plywood in units Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to the negligent and careless handling of cargo by the stevedores much damage has been caused to the goods. Due to improper slinging several units were dropped from the slings and broken totally. In view of the above I hold the stevedoring company responsible for the damage caused and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, A.S. Nesterov Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Dordrecht, 26th October, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” Whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: leaking of cargo Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that during loading of aluminium silicate to holds No.1 and No.2 some part of cargo leaked from transporter to deck, water and shore. In view of the above I hold the shipper responsible for the loss of cargo caused and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, N.N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Dordrecht, 26th October, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” Whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: quality of cargo Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that loading of aluminium silicate to holds No.1 and No.2 sometimes was interrupted by rain. But owing to failure lifting mechanism of loading transporter we could not close hatches immediately as pipe of transporter obstructed to do this. In reason of this some water falled into the holds. In view of the above I have no bear responsible for the quality of cargo and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, N.N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Fecamp, 12th June, 2001 m/v “STK 1012” To Stevedoreing Company, Receivers and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: ship’s nonresponsibility for damage to the cargo of sawntimber in packages Dear Sirs, This is to inform you that some dunnage was ordered by ship to load cargo of sawntimber in packages on the deck of m/v “STK 1012”. This dunnage was necessary to protect cargo from prominent parts of hatchcovers. Plenty separated boards were used by stevedores of port of Bely Ruchey for dunnage and were not included to the Bills of Lading. Ship take all necessary steps to protect cargo during loading and during voyage. According to ship’s and stevedores tallies at port of Bely Ruchey 522 packages of sawntimber were loaded to m/v “STK 1012” and according to ship’s tally 522 packages were discharged at port of Fecamp not counting separated boards used for dunnage. In view of the above I repudate your claims concerned to quantity and quality of cargo discharged at your port. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Fecamp, 12th June, 2001 m/v “STK 1012” To Stevedoreing Company, Receivers and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: damage of the cargo of sawntimber in packages Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that today on the 12 th June 2001 at 08:55 local time during discharging of deck cargo from m/v “STK 1012” owing to the negligent and careless handling of cargo by the stevedores control bands on two packages were torn and contents of these packages separated. All happened was recorded to videotape. In view of the above I hold the stevedoring company responsible for the damage caused and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” /v “STK 1012”, Port of Fredericia, 4th December, 2000 To FREDERICIA SHIPPING A/S Letter of Protest Re: discharging of m/v “STK 1012” Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that during discharging cargo of DAP in bulk from m/v “STK 1012” to trucks some part of fertilizers spilled from grab to quay and into the water. And what is more some part of our cargo was discharged from trucks straight to the wet quay. All happened was recorded to videotape. In reason of this I shall bear no responsible for the shortage of cargo and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Hamburg, 12th December, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” Harbour No.2, berth “B” To Hamburg Port, Agents “TRANSIGO” Letter of Protest Re: damage to guard railing of m/v “STK 1012” during discharging Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to the negligent and careless work by the crane operators the following damage has been caused to my ship for which I hold them fully responsible. 1. On the container deck two rail stanchions in way of Hold No.1 were turn away from deck. 2. One rail stanchion in the way of Hold No.1 was badly bended. Kindly have the damage repaired before completion discharging. And also kindly request you to take steps to avoid further damage to my ship. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Joutseno, 10th October, 2002 m/v “STK 1012” To Agents “INTERCARRIERS”, Stevedoring Company “SZEPANIAK OY” and all to whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: damage to guard railing of m/v “STK 1012” during discharging Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to the negligent and careless work by the crane operators some damage has been caused to my ship for which I hold them fully responsible. During discharging cargo of aspen pulpwood from Hold No.1 guard railing on starboad side of the ship was broken. In view of the above I hold the stevedoring company responsible for the damage caused and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you settle this matter to carry out necessary repair of guard railing before completion discharging. And also kindly request you to take steps to avoid further damage to my ship. Yours faithfully, A. Nesterov Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Kiel, 17th October, 1999 m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” Cellpap Terminal Kiel GmbH Letter of Protest Re: damage of the cargo of wood pulp in units Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to the negligent and careless handling of cargo by the stevedores much damage has been caused to the goods. Due to improper slinging several units were dropped from the slings and broken totally. A great number of units are deformed and wet before loading, their packing torn and dirty. I hold you responsible for the damage caused and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and would kindly request you advise the consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, M. A. Kireev Master of the m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” Kiel, 17th October, 1999 m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” Cellpap Terminal Kiel GmbH Letter of Protest Re: stowage of the cargo of wood pulp in units Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to improper stowage of wood pulp in the holds some empty spaces were generated. Only after more than once indications to your foreman some units were shifted and stowed closer one to another but some spaces remained empty yet. In the circumstances I have to make an official statement to effect that all cargo should be stowed and secured properly by your company and that I shall bear no responsibility for any claims in connection with negligence of your stevedores. At the same time I hold the Stevedoring Company, Cellpap Terminal Kiel GmbH, responsible for the damages and for all consequences which may arise therefrom, of which I kindly request you to advise consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, M. A. Kireev Master of the m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” Kiel, 16th October, 1999 m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” Cellpap Terminal Kiel GmbH Letter of Protest Re: damage to the cargo Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to the negligent and careless handling of cargo by the stevedores much damage has been caused to the goods. Due to improper slinging several reels dropped from the slings and from the side-loader were damaged: covering was torn and edges were dented. I have to inform you that spots on packages of several reels not wet because holds have been dry. In view of the above I have to attribute all losses incurred here upon to the stevedoring company. Yours faithfully, M. A. Kireev Master of the m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” m/v “STK 1012”, Port of Landskrona, 8th March, 2002 To Agents “LANDSKRONA SHIP AGENTS”, Consignees and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: spillage cargo of weat during discharging of m/v “STK 1012” Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that during discharging cargo of weat in bulk from holds m/v “STK 1012” to loading hopper some part of grain spilled from grab to the deck, quay and water space between ship and quay. In reason of this I shall bear no responsible for the shortage of cargo and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the Consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, A. Nesterov Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Larvik, 13th November, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” Whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: damage to the ship Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to the negligent and careless handling of cargo by the stevedores some damage has been caused to the ship. During discharging cargo of sawntimber in packages from Hold No.1 guard railing on starboad side of the ship was broken. In view of the above I hold the stevedoring company responsible for the damage caused and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you settle this matter to carry out necessary repair of guard railing. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Larvik, 13th November, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” Whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: quantity of the cargo of sawntimber in packages Dear Sirs, This is to inform you that according to tallies of the Independent Tally Service “NEPTUNE NW Ltd.” dated 06.11.2000 425 packages of sawntimber were loaded to our ship at the port of St. Petersburg. According ship’s tallies the same quantity of cargo as well as 425 packages of sawntimber were discharged today at port of Larvik. In view of the above I protest against the all claims concerning quantity of cargo and all consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the consignees and all concerned. Copy of Cargo statement No. 109 issued by the Independent Tally Service “NEPTUNE NW Ltd.” dated 06.11.2000 and copies of ship’s tally sheets made at port of Larvik are enclosed. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Larvik, 13th November, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” Whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: damage of the cargo of sawntimber in packages Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to the negligent and careless handling of cargo by the stevedores much damage has been caused to the goods. During discharging cargo of sawntimber in packages from Hold No.1 bundles on one package were torn and contents of this unit were leaked. In view of the above I hold the stevedoring company responsible for the damage caused and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” m/v “STK 1012”, Port of Hamina, 21st September, 2002 To Agents “DAHLBERG AGNCY” (STEVECO OY), Hamina, Finland, Consignees “HAMINAN VEISTOSAHA OY”, Tanttutie 6, 49460 Hamina, Finland, Charterers “BYGGSTAL AB”, Trollhattam, Sweden, and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: applying of lien on cargo and delay of discharging of m/v “STK 1012” in port of Hamina. Dear Sirs, This is to inform you that I have to apply the lien on cargo in connection with non-payment of the freight. The discharging of m/v “STK 1012” can be carried out only under the special order of the shipowners after confirmation of the freight payment. In reason of this I hold the Charterers “BYGGSTAL AB” responsible for the delay of unloading of m/v “STK 1012” and for all claims and other consequences which may arise therefrom. Yours faithfully, A. Nesterov Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Mustola, 26th September, 2001 m/v “STK 1012” To Agents “INTERCARRIERS”, Stevedoring Company Letter of Protest Re: damage to container sockets on hatchcover of Hold No.1 of m/v “STK 1012” during discharging cargo of aspen pulplogs Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to the negligent and careless work by the crane operator the following damage has been caused to my ship during discharging cargo of aspen pulplogs today on the 26 th September 2001 at 08:40 LT, for which I hold him fully responsible: On the forward part of hatchcover of Hold No.1 four container sockets were turn away from and badly deformed. In consequence of this, above mentioned sockets cannot be used for proper accomodation and securing of four containers and ship’s container capacity is reduced. Kindly have the damage repaired before completion discharging. And also kindly request you to take steps to avoid further damage to my ship. Yours faithfully, A. Nesterov Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Muuga, 24th December, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” berth No. 6 To Agents “MERKTRANS”, Stevedoring Company Letter of Protest Re: damage to guard railing of m/v “STK 1012” during loading Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to the negligent and careless work by the crane operator the following damage has been caused to my ship today on the 24th December 2000 at 20:40 LT, for which I hold him fully responsible: On the container deck two rail stanchions in way of Hold No.1 were turn away from deck. Kindly have the damage repaired before completion discharging. And also kindly request you to take steps to avoid further damage to my ship. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” Port of Neustadt, 28th December, 1999 To whom may concern Letter of Protest Dear Sirs, This is to inform you that I am not in position to admit your claim regarding the alleged wetness of cargo of UREA IN BULK in No.1 hold of m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” for the following reasons. On arrival to Kappeln and prior to discharge all cargo was looked around by surveyor and found in good condition. Nowhere traces of water were found. I suppose that cargo is not wet and only changed it colour owing to touching with rusty bottom. In the circumstances I have to make an official statement that neither my m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” nor my shipowners will bear no responsibility for any claims which may arise in connection with wetness of cargo of UREA IN BULK discharged from above said ship at port of Kappeln and at port of Neustadt. Yours faithfully, N. A. Proskuryakov, Master of the m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” Port of Pärnu, 28th November, 1999 To whom may concern Letter of Protest Dear Sirs, Re: quantity of cargo loaded on m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” I have to draw your attention to the fact that according to measuring of draft of m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” quantity of cargo of PEATMOSS loaded into the holds of above said vessel consists 1’798.348 metric tons. In the circumstances I have to make an official statement that neither my m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” nor my shipowners will bear no responsibility for any claims which may arise in connection with shortage of cargo of PEATMOSS loaded on above said ship. Yours faithfully, N. A. Proskuryakov Master of the m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” m/v “STK 1012”, Port of Rendsburg, 9th January, 2001 To Agents “AHLMANN-ZERSSEN GMBH & CO KG”, Consignees and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: spillage cargo of fertilizers during discharging of m/v “STK 1012” Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that during discharging cargo of fertilizers in bulk from m/v “STK 1012” to transporter some part of fertilizers spilled from grab to the deck, quay and space between ship and quay. In reason of this I shall bear no responsible for the shortage of cargo and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the Consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” m/v “STK 1012”, berth No. 107 Port of Southampton, 4th January, 2001 To Agents “CLARKSON BROTHERS LTD”, Consignees, and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: claims to quality cargo of D.A.P. in bulk loaded at Port of Muuga into Hold No.1 of m/v “STK 1012” Dear Sirs, This is to inform you that I am not in position to admit your claim regarding the alleged damage of cargo of DIAMMONIUM PHOSPATE IN BULK in Hold No.1 of m/v “STK 1012” for the following reasons. 1. Before loading cargo of D.A.P. at port of Muuga (Tallinn) the check of hatch covers of Holds No. 1 and No. 2 on watertightness and pressure test of stop valves of drainage system of above Holds were carried out by crew. For these tests we used main fire pump with water pressure in the main 6 kgs/sq.cm. No leakage of water through hatch covers and filtration through bilge containers and ballast tanks into the Holds were not found. We also cheked bilge container level alarm and found it in good condition and working properly. 2. Holds inspection was also carried out by surveyors. They found Holds No. 1 and No. 2 clean and dry without any foreign things and to be suitable for loading and transportation of the above said cargo. 3. The air temperature during loading was about minus 5 – minus 3°C and air humidity was high cause sometimes snow falled down and visibility was poor. During the snow hatch covers were closed and loading did not take place. The wind during loading was from northerly direction with speed about 15 m/s. 4. The loading was executed by tipping cargo from 20-foot containers into the Holds. Containers were loaded from rail-wagons by grabs. Due to this and due to negative air temperature cargo might contain wet frozen lump and pieces of ice. 5. Ship sailed from Muuga on the 25th December, 2000 and arrived to Southampton on the 30th December, 2000. During the voyage the air temperature changed from minus 3 to plus 5°C. 6. Due to it nature the cargo of DIAMMONIUM PHOSPATE is very hygroscopic and may take moisture from air. In reason of above I suppose that alleged damage of cargo arised as the result of temperature difference and moisture condensation on the metallic surfaces like bottom, boards and hatch covers of the Hold No. 1. In the circumstances I have to make an official statement that neither my m/v “STK 1012” nor my shipowners will bear no responsibility for any claims which may arise in connection with damage of cargo of D.A.P. IN BULK discharged from above said ship at Port of Southampton. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Szczecin, 21th December, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” To Agents “DAN SHIPPING AND TRADING”, Stevedoring Company and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: tally of the cargo of aluminium ingots in bundles and aluminium T-bars Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that during discharging of the cargo of aluminium ingots in bundles and aluminium T-bars from m/v “STK 1012” at port of Szczecin port tallymen were not present on the quay. According to the ship’s tallies 143 bundles of aluminium ingots and 1626 aluminium T-bars discharged at port of Szczecin. Hold No.1 and Hold No.2 are empty. All discharging was recorded to videotape. In view of the above I protest against any claims concerning quantity of cargo and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Szczecin, 21th December, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” To Agents “DAN SHIPPING AND TRADING”, Stevedoring Company and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: damage to the cargo of aluminium ingots in bundles Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to the negligent and careless handling of cargo by the stevedores some damage was caused to the cargo during discharging. Due to improper using old forkloader in Hold No. 1 several bundles were dropped from the forks to the bottom. As a result of these some packages were deformed and ingots were shifted one form another. All happened recorded to videotape. In view of the above I hold the stevedoring company responsible for the damage caused and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” Port of Virtsu, 18th November, 1999 To whom may concern Letter of Protest Dear Sirs, Re: quantity of cargo loaded on m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” I have to draw your attention to the fact that it is not possible to check draft of m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” with good accuracy owing to high waves at the place of the loading. In reason of this it is not possible to determine exact quantity of cargo of CRUSHED DOLOMITE loaded on my ship. In the circumstances I have to make an official statement that neither my m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” nor my shipowners will bear no responsibility for any claims which may arise in connection with shortage or surplus of cargo of CRUSHED DOLOMITE loaded on above said ship. Yours faithfully, N. A. Proskuryakov Master of the m/v “VOLGO-BALT 112” Vuoksi, 14th August, 2001 m/v “STK 1012” To Agents, Stevedoring Company, Consignees and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: damage to the cargo of birch pulplogs Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that during discharging cargo of birch pulplogs from hold No.1 of m/v “STK 1012” at your port much damage has been caused to the goods. Due to oil leakage from hydraulic system of timber loader some oil falled on deck of my ship, on the cargo and into the hold No.1. In the circumstances I have to make an official statement to the effect that my m/v “STK 1012” has brought the cargo in good order and condition and that I shall no bear responsibility for any claims in connection with the above mentioned damage which was caused to the goods in the course of breakage of timber loader. At the same time I hold The Stevedoring Company responsible for the damage caused and for all the consequences, which may arise therefrom, of which and I would kindly request you advise the Stevedoring Company, Consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, A. Nesterov Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Vuoksi, 14th August, 2001 m/v “STK 1012” To Stevedoring Company and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: leakage of oil Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that during discharging cargo of birch pulplogs from hold No.1 of m/v “STK 1012” at your port hydraulic system of timber loader was damaged and oil leaked. In reason of this some oil falled on deck of my ship, to the cargo and into the hold No.1. In view of the above I hold Stevedoring Company responsible for the damage caused to my ship and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request remove all oil spots from deck of my ship and from board and bottom of hold No.1 before discharging is finished. Yours faithfully, A. Nesterov Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Howdendyke, 23d October, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” To: HUMBERSIDE SEA AND LAND SERVICE Letter of Protest Re: timber dunnage Dear Sirs, Owing to that as of today's date no timber dunnage will be landed at the port of Howdenyke I would kindly request you, please, arrange with the Stevedoring Company that all timber dunnage should be slinged and discharged from Holds No. 1 and No. 2 and stowed on deck of the m/v "STK 1012" before departure of our ship from above mentioned port. Thanking you beforehand. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Howdendyke, 19th October, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” Whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: damages can be caused to the ship Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to the negligent and careless handling of cargo by the stevedores some damages can be caused to the ship during discharging. Due to improper slinging several bundles were dropped from the slings to bottom of Hold No.2. As a result of these bottom of the Hold No.2 and can be damaged. In view of the above I hold the stevedoring company responsible for the all damages can be caused to the ship and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the said Stevedoring Company all concerned. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” Howdendyke, 19th October, 2000 m/v “STK 1012” Whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: damage of the cargo of lead ingots in bundles Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to the negligent and careless handling of cargo by the stevedores some damage was caused to the cargo during discharging. Due to improper slinging several bundles were dropped from the slings. As a result of these some strengthening tapes on these bundles were broken totally. In view of the above I hold the stevedoring company responsible for the damage caused and for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” m/v “STK 1012”, berth No. 107 Port of Southampton, 4th January, 2001 Hold Inspection Report This is to certify that we, the undersigned, inspected the Holds No. 1 and No. 2 of the m/v “STK 1012” after discharging of cargo of DIAMMONIUM PHOSPATE IN BULK and found them clean and dry and without any traces of water. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” m/v “STK 1012”, Port of St. Petersburg, 20th September, 2002 To Agents “NOTH-WEST MARINE”, St. Petersburg, Russia, Charterers “BYGGSTAL AB”, Trollhattam, Sweden, Shippers “BST FOREST”, St. Petersburg, Russia and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: shortshipment of cargo of coniferous sawlogs during loading of m/v “STK 1012” in port of St. Petersburg and dead freight payment. Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that according to the Bill of Lading 1395.79 cubic metres of coniferous sawlogs were loaded on board of the m/v “STK 1012”. At the same time according to Notice of Readiness our ship is in all respects ready to load her cargo of coniferous sawlogs, 1500.000 cubic metres and upto full and complete cargo as per Charter Party. In reason of this I hold you responsible for the shortshipment and for the dead freight inccured. Yours faithfully, A. Nesterov Master of the m/v “STK 1012” m/v “STK 1012”, berth No. 6 Port of Muuga, 23th December, 2000 Whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: loading of m/v “STK 1012” Enclosure: Preliminary cargo plan Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that during loading cargo of D.A.P. to m/v “STK 1012” level of cargo should not exceed the height of hold coaming and obstruct to close the holds by hatch covers. Ship must have always good chance to close hatches to prevent ingress of moisture into the holds in the issue of precipitation. Also, please, draw your attention to properly trimming cargo in the holds. According to preliminary cargo plan it is necessary to fill Hold No.2 to level of limit lines drawn at coaming and load in the Hold No.2 minimum 920.0 mt of cargo. The rest part of cargo should be loaded in Hold No.1 otherwise ship could not take full cargo. In view of above I shall hold Stevedoring Company for damage to the cargo and all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the said Stevedoring Company, Consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012” m/v “STK 1012”, berth No. 36 Port of Rostock, 16th October, 2002 To Agents “AHLMANN-ZERSSEN GMBH”, Stevedoring company and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: loading of m/v “STK 1012” Enclosure: Preliminary cargo plan Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that during loading cargo of malt to m/v “STK 1012” level of cargo should not exceed the height of hold coaming and obstruct to close the holds by hatch covers. Ship must have always good chance to close hatches to prevent ingress of moisture into the holds in the issue of precipitation. Also, please, draw your attention to properly trimming cargo in the holds. According to preliminary cargo plan it is necessary to fill Hold No.2 to level of limit lines drawn at coaming which are 30 cm below coaming edge and load in the Hold No.2 about 550.0 metric tons of cargo. The rest part of cargo should be loaded in Hold No.1 otherwise ship could not take full cargo. In view of above I shall hold Stevedoring Company for damage to the cargo and all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the said Stevedoring Company, Consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, A. Nesterov Master of the m/v “STK 1012” m/v “STK 1012”, berth No. 4 Port of Muuga, 8th February, 2002 To Agents “STIVTRANS”, Shippers, Stevedoring Company, Consignees and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: quality of sawntimbers in packages loaded to m/v “STK 1012” Dear Sirs, This is to inform you that as a result of visual inspection of cargo of sawntimbers in packages on quay and during loading above mentioned cargo to m/v “STK 1012” the following facts were found: 1. Sawntimbers were kept on unprotected storage protractedly. 2. Some boards in packages changed colour as a result of long-term exposure of moisture. 3. All packages are stained 4. Bands are weak. In reason of this I shall bear no responsible for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I have to make following remarks in all bills of lading: 1. LOADED FROM OPEN STORAGE. 2. ALL PACKAGES COVERED WITH WET SPOTS AND STAINED, BOARDS DISCOLOURED AND DARKEN. 3. BANDS ARE WEAK. I would kindly request you advise the Shippers, Stevedoring Company, Consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, A. Nesterov Master of the m/v “STK 1012” m/v “STK 1012”, berth No. 4 Port of Muuga, 9th February, 2002 To Agents “STIVTRANS”, Shippers, Stevedoring Company, Consignees and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: quantity of sawntimbers in packages loaded to m/v “STK 1012” Dear Sirs, This is to inform you that vessel’s cargo (stowage) capacity is fully used. In reason of this I am not able to take any more cargo of sawntimbers in packages on board of m/v “STK 1012” and I shall bear no responsible for the all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom. I would kindly request you advise the Shippers, Stevedoring Company, Consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, A. Nesterov Master of the m/v “STK 1012” m/v “STK 1012”, berth No. 8 Port of Muuga, 8th December, 2000 To Agents “MERKTRANS”, Stevedoring Company “BDP” and all whom it may concern Letter of Protest Re: damage to cargo of monoammonium phosphate Dear Sirs, I have to draw your attention to the fact that owing to negligent and careless handling of cargo much damage has been cased to the good. Today, on the 8th December 2000 at 05.00 LT during loading cargo of M.A.P. via pipe transporter to Hold No.2 of m/v “STK 1012” level of cargo has been exceeded the height of hold coaming and obstruct to close the holds by hatch covers. This happened due to failure by Chief Stevedore A. GANENKO to execute requirement of ship’s administration concerning trimming of cargo which was handed to Stevedores in written form. At 05.10 LT drizzle was started and trimming of cargo was fulfilled during precipitations and some moisture ingressed into the Hold No.2. In view of above I hold Stevedoring Company for damage to the cargo and all claims and other consequences, which may arise therefrom and I would kindly request you advise the said Stevedoring Company, Consignees and all concerned. Yours faithfully, N. Brusnik Master of the m/v “STK 1012”
